click to show more information

click to hide/show information About your Search

20121112
20121120
Search Results 0 to 7 of about 8 (some duplicates have been removed)
spending and government but not for a while. >> that was designed to technology on willingness to make tough cuts. >> as the cliff was crafted to be so distasteful officials would do anything to avoid it. >> you don't think they will cut military former military are cut entitlements? >> they assume it is so bad they would not to accept it but they are not even talking about cuts. talking $1 trillion over 10 years but not real cuts but baseline budgeting teeseven explained that. i hate when you talk that way because nobody understands that. if i cut it means i spend less but it would you do it means? >> we have already written into the next budget the automatic increase. if it is a $10 billion increase and cut it down at 9 billion that they cut it down we just now increased 9 billion instead of 10 billion. it is done a purpose so people get confused. that is the reason nothing happens. they got away with this horrible sides there was a lot of wealth of the country and they could get along. we will raise subsidies and one versus the other but now the treasury is there the country is bank
but not for a while. >> that was designed to technology on willingness to make tough cuts. >> as the cliff was crafted to be so distasteful officials would do anything to avoid it. >> you don't think they will cut military former military are cut entitlements? >> they assume it is so bad they would not to accept it but they are not even talking about cuts. talking $1 trillion over 10 years but not real cuts but baseline budgeting teeseven explained that. i hate when you talk that way because nobody understands that. if i cut it means i spend less but it would you do it means? >> we have already written into the next budget the automatic increase. if it is a $10 billion increase and cut it down at 9 billion that they cut it down we just now increased 9 billion instead of 10 billion. it is done a purpose so people get confused. that is the reason nothing happens. they got away with this horrible sides there was a lot of wealth of the country and they could get along. we will raise subsidies and one versus the other but now the treasury is there the country is bankrupt and will not admit it and that is w
at the technology department don't know what to believe when it comes to this guy. megyn: the irony of the security paranoia how he made the money in the first place. the squall treat journal reporting that attorney general eric holder knew of the petraeus investigation as early as september. if that's true why did he not inform white house about it? we'll have a fair and balanced debate on that right after the break. a high school * hockey league coming under fire for a plan to save money by putting "the national anthem" on ice. >> i don't agree with it. it's a bad policy. >> this investigation has been going on for months. how is it that the white house didn't have any idea of this until the day after the election? and congress a few days later? >> well, i would refer you to the fb with i. they have, as i understand it, protocols in place for when they notify the legislative and executive branches of investigations. and it is, you know, simply a fact that the white house was not aware of the situation regarding general petraeus until wednesday, and the situation regarding general allen until frid
money with charles payne, technology stock. charles: i tell you out the gate it is volatile. buckle up. goldman sachs upgraded it today, target of 106 reduced expectations and the idea that market share is taken from cisco which is true and focus on network, that is in the headlines. network security's, a cyberattacks, and gross margin is 86% operating, and company that hired people hired people. it is an expensive stock and explosive growth. the stock pulled back recently, a new product out. the debate is 2.0. [talking over each other] charles: having said that -- melissa: i know technicals. i don't know anything else. i know interest rates. politics. charles: a heck of a combination. i will use 80 as a stock if anyone is thinking of buying it or anybody is in and on the upside, the first trading card is 95 and long term if you are buying or holding to handle the volatility acting $110 visited a good company and cloud security planned service provider and ecommerce indicator and my biggest problem is the street is always at odds with this company. sometimes doesn't seem it can grow fa
Search Results 0 to 7 of about 8 (some duplicates have been removed)